Legal Opinion
Amperse v. Fleckenstein
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Proceedings to recover possession of lands under the forcible detainer act. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The only error complained of in this case is set forth in the following extract from the record:
“ The evidence being closed, the case proceeded to argument by counsel for the respective parties to the jury, and, during the argument of counsel for the plaintiff, he proceeded to call their attention to and discuss certain testimony which had been given in the case with reference to what plaintiff had sworn to upon the trial in the court below, and particularly with reference to th.3 testimony given by Commissioner Wattles, before whom the case was tried, and other witnesses, which was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wheeler v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Rutter v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Pringle v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897