State v. Seay
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from conviction and sentence for armed robbery. His assignments of error claim that (1) he was denied a speedy trial, (2) he was subjected to double jeopardy, (3) a knife found on him when he was apprehended should not have been received in evidence, (4) the evidence did not support conviction, and (5) a less than unanimous jury verdict should not have been received. The last assignment does not merit discussion.
Hugh Erickson was attendant at a service station when, at 1:30 to 1:45 a.m., January 4, 1971, a distinctively damaged vehicle drove in. Its two occupants, one of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. AronhaltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972