Legal Opinion

State v. Seay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1972No. C-71-01-0016CrPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant appeals from conviction and sentence for armed robbery. His assignments of error claim that (1) he was denied a speedy trial, (2) he was subjected to double jeopardy, (3) a knife found on him when he was apprehended should not have been received in evidence, (4) the evidence did not support conviction, and (5) a less than unanimous jury verdict should not have been received. The last assignment does not merit discussion.

Hugh Erickson was attendant at a service station when, at 1:30 to 1:45 a.m., January 4, 1971, a distinctively damaged vehicle drove in. Its two occupants, one of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. AronhaltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API