Legal Opinion

Spring v. Curry

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 7, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This petition is before this court upon an appeal from a decree entered by order of a judge of the Probate Court without a report of evidence taken under. G. L. c. 215, § 18, or a report of facts found by the judge made upon a request under G. L. c. 215, § 11, or anything to show what facts the probate judge found. Thé sole question presented to this court, therefore, is whether the decree was within the scope of the petition. G. L. c. 215, § 21, Brogna v. Commissioner of Banks, 248 Mass. 241.

The copy of an account was improperly annexed to the record,

It is obvious that facts might have been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Brogna v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Nesbit v. CandeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Naylor v. NourseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Walden v. WaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conley v. FenelonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Hite v. HiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Seavey v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Brayton v. StoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. McCarthy v. HalloranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API