Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Halloran

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 24, 1946Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, P. J.

Action of contract in which a landlord seeks to recover for use and occupation of premises allegedly owned by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s declaration as amended contained two counts, one on an account annexed for use and occupation for the months of January to September inclusive, nine months at $45.00' a month, or a total of $405; and the other, *299alleging that the defendant was a trespasser on premises owned by the plaintiff for the same period of nine months to the damage of the plaintiff as in her writ and declaration alleged.

The defendant’s amended answer is a general denial; that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Dillon v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. James B. Rendle Co. v. Conley & Daggett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Schon v. Odd Fellows Building Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API