Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Yamhill County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 4, 1995No. LUBA 94-105; CA A86197PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner appealed to LUBA from Yamhill County’s approval of respondent Lisacs’ (respondents) application to build a non-resource dwelling in a low density residential zone, which is subject to a Willamette River Greenway (WRG) overlay district. LUBA remanded the decision, but rejected petitioner’s contention that the county wrongly interpreted section 902.06.E. of its zoning ordinance (YCZO) as being consistent with granting a permit for the dwelling. Petitioner seeks review, and assigns error to that ruling by LUBA. We reverse.
Section 902.06.E. provides that an applicant for a Greenway…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leathers v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Nicholson v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997