Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2014No. 2013-KA-00114-SCTPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this aggravated-assault conviction, James Marco Ferguson challenges the sufficiency of the State’s evidence that he used a knife during the assault, the trial court’s denial of a proposed jury instruction on his competence to testify, and the trial court’s refusal to admit evidence of the victim’s drug use. Ferguson also raises ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Katrina Barnes and Ferguson met in October 2010 and became friends. On March 22, 2011, Ferguson took Barnes and her son…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wetz v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Coleman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Goff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Whitten v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Archer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marvin Kirk v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Graves v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Larry Press Wells v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Antwain D. Thomas v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API