Sieward v. Denechaud
Supreme Court of Louisiana
.Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George Henry ThSard, Judge. Action by Marie Louise Sieward and others against Justin F. Denechaud and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
BREAUX, C. J.
The facts are that the. father of defendant had been for many years engaged in the hotel business in the city of New Orleans. In 1884 he became the tenant of the property, corner Perdido and Caronde-let streets, in which he opened the Dene-chaud Hotel. In the year 1894 his lessor sold the property to the late A. H. Sieward, plaintiff's husband. After this purchase, Sie-ward leased to E. E. Denechaud, the father. The latter continued to occupy the property as a hotel known under his name.
The record contains two leases; one dated in 1902, and the other in 1905.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vonderbank v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
- Prude v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
- Jurgens v. IttmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Pepper v. LabrotU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1881
- Armstrong v. KleinhansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tyson v. Surf Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Brewer v. Forest Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Edwards v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Touchet v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.