Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Spurlock

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

cited 2 Min. Inst. 506; 1 Lom. Dig. 795; 2 Nob. 269 ;1 Graft. 186, 190; 25 Graft. 141; 24 W. Va. 238 p’t 1, Syll.; 6 S. & E. 21; 18 W. Va. 598; 10 Graft. 281; 25 W. Va. 757. cited 26 W. Va. 630 ; 27 W. Va. 468; 24 W. Va. 239; 1 Graft. 195; 28 W. Va. 52-64; 28 W. Va. 820 p’t 1, Syll.; Id. 824, 825 ; 8 Graft. 12; 2 W. Va. 187; 19 W. Va. 323; 27 W. Va. 511.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge :

This is a writ of error sued out by Melvin Spurlock to a judgment of tlie Circuit Court of Cabell county, rendered 23d February, 1888, in an action of ejectment brought by Alice Ketehum and others against Spurlock.

*598The assignment of error is that the court refused to set aside the verdict of the jury finding the land for the plaintiffs; and under this assignment the briefs of appellant’s attorneys contend that the verdict should have been set aside — First, because the plaintiffs failed to make out a •prima fade case ; second, because the defendant showed a better title.

Let us…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Core v. FaupelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hylton v. HyltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1844
  3. Lynch v. AndrewsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Waggoner v. WolfWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nowlin v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. GobbleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McNeeley v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Swann v. ThayerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API