Legal Opinion

Foster v. Preston Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1954No. 32630PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

— Blasting operations conducted by Preston Mill Company frightened mother mink owned by B. W. Foster, and caused the mink to kill their kittens. Foster brought this action against the company to recover damages. His second amended complaint, upon which the case was tried, sets forth a cause of action on the theory of absolute liability, and, in the alternative, a cause of action on the theory of nuisance.

After a trial to the court without a jury, judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $1,953.68. The theory adopted by the court was that, after defendant received notice of the effect…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Maitland v. Twin City Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Klepsch v. DonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Schade Brewing Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Klein v. Pyrodyne CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Galbreath v. Engineering Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kind v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API