Klein v. Pyrodyne Corporation
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
The plaintiffs in this case are persons injured when an aerial shell at a public fireworks exhibition went astray and exploded near them. The defendant is the pyrotechnic company hired to set up and discharge the fireworks. The issue before this court is whether pyrotechnicians are strictly hable for damages caused by fireworks displays. We hold that they are.
Defendant Pyrodyne Corporation (Pyrodyne) is a general contractor for aerial fireworks at pubhc fireworks displays. Pyrodyne contracted to procure fireworks, to provide pyrotechnic operators, and to display the fireworks at the Western…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Siegler v. KuhlmanWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- New Meadows Holding Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Herberg v. SwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Langan v. Valicopters, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.