Legal Opinion · Concurrence

California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 2017No. C075930; C075954Published

1Concurrence

HULL, J.,

Concurring and Dissenting.—I concur in part I of the opinion; as to part II, I dissent.

The majority concludes the cap-and-trade auction program is not a tax because (1) the purchase of auction credits by businesses is voluntary, (2) the purchasing entities receive “a thing of value” in the nature of a commodity by their purchase, that is, the right to pollute the air and (3) we need not be concerned in this appeal about the use of the auction proceeds.

On this record, (1) the purchase of auction credits by Morning Star Packing Company (Morning Star) or other businesses similarly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Mills v. County of TrinityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API