Legal Opinion
A. M. Webb & Co. v. Robert P. Miller Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 27, 1949No. 9739PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.
This diversity case is being considered by us for a second time. On the previous appeal, we reinstated the complaint after it had been dismissed in the court below. Our opinion, which includes much of the factual background of the case, is reported at 1946, 157 F.2d 865, and need not be here repeated.1
Plaintiff (“Webb”), a middleman, seeks an accounting and damages for breach of contract by defendant (“Miller”), a manufacturer of underwear and sport shirts. It is undisputed (1) that the agents of the parties to this case signed a “memorandum of agreement” on January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. LipowiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- A. M. Webb & Co. v. Robert P. Miller Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- A. M. Webb & Co. v. Robert P. Miller Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. 3,065.94 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
- Francis T. Ratigan v. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commodities, Inc., and the Troy Union Railroad Company, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.