Legal Opinion
In re Levy
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 1, 1924No. 1678PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office rejecting claims numbered 26. to 35, inclusive, in appellant’s application. Claim No. 32 is sufficiently illustrative and is here reproduced:
“32. The method of receiving and amplifying high frequency oscillations whereby the incoming energy is utilized to produce oscillations of a different locally predetermined high frequency which are then amplified and the resultant energy utilized to produce oscillations of a second different, locally determined, high frequency, which are then amplified, detected, and indicated.”
These…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cox v. HeadleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Nichols v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- American Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Humiston v. VoorheesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.