Legal Opinion

In re Levy

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 1, 1924No. 1678PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office rejecting claims numbered 26. to 35, inclusive, in appellant’s application. Claim No. 32 is sufficiently illustrative and is here reproduced:

“32. The method of receiving and amplifying high frequency oscillations whereby the incoming energy is utilized to produce oscillations of a different locally predetermined high frequency which are then amplified and the resultant energy utilized to produce oscillations of a second different, locally determined, high frequency, which are then amplified, detected, and indicated.”

These…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. HeadleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mueller Brass Co. v. Reading Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Nichols v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. American Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Humiston v. VoorheesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API