Cox v. Headley
District Court, District of Columbia
Appeal from Assistant Commissioner of Patents. Two interference proceedings between Charles F. Cox and Benjamin T. Headley and another, and between Charles F. Cox, Benjamin T. Headley and another, and Francis W. Pawling. From a decision awarding priority to Headley, Charles F. Cox appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from Patent Office decisions in two interference proceedings, Nos. 40,043 and 40,044, in which priority was awarded the junior parties, Headley and Thompson.
The parties to interference No. 40,043 are the appellant, Cox, and the appellees, Headley and Thompson. The invention involved in this interference is an automatic machine for making glass bottles, and is expressed in 10 counts, taken from the Headley and Thompson application, of which we reproduce the first:
“1. In a glass bottling machine, the combination of mold carrying means rotatably mounted, a^pair of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Nichols v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- In re LevyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- McKee v. NoonanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936