Legal Opinion

Beaumont v. Wilkes-Barre City

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County

Decided May 4, 1891No. 144PublishedCited by 8 opinions

No. 144 January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 7 October Term 1886, C. P. in Equity. To tlie number and term of the court below, E. B. Beaumont, and a large number of others, for themselves and such other property owners and citizens as should desire to join, etc., filed a bill in equity against the city of Wilkes-Barre, praying, upon the facts relating to a certain assessment of the cost of the paving and curbing of Franklin street, therein averred, for an injunction…

Read the full summary

No. 144 January Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 7 October Term 1886, C. P. in Equity. To tlie number and term of the court below, E. B. Beaumont, and a large number of others, for themselves and such other property owners and citizens as should desire to join, etc., filed a bill in equity against the city of Wilkes-Barre, praying, upon the facts relating to a certain assessment of the cost of the paving and curbing of Franklin street, therein averred, for an injunction restraining the defendant: 1. “ From collecting said tax or assessment from your orators. 2. “ From enforcing the…

1Per curiam

The careful and elaborate opinion of the learned judge of the court below has spared us the necessity of discussing this-case. We affirm the decree for the reasons given by him.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clifton Land Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. City of Corry v. Corry Chair Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Erie City v. WillisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Franklin v. HancockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Tripp v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API