Tripp v. City of Yankton
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action to cancel a special tax. Defendant had judgment, from which and from an order denying his motion for a hew trial, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
To recover alleged damages occasioned by an excavation by th@ defendant, a miwicipal corporation, on the *517south and west sides of block 50, Yankton, and particularly the west end of plaintiff’s lots 7, 8 and 9 thereof, and to cancel and restrain the collection of a special tax levied on account of a sidewalk constructed of cement on the grade thus prepared, this action was instituted, and the appeal is by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant and an order overruling a motion for a new trial. Subsequently to the answer of respondent, the complaint was amended by leave of court, and served…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Morrison v. HershireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Scarborough v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- White v. People ex rel. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Gatch v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beddow v. FlageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Sheets v. ProsserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- González Reyes v. González ReyesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932
- Koenkamp v. PicassoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Heyler v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.