Legal Opinion

Diez v. Pearson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1992No. 61018PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Judge.

Plaintiff William F. Diez appeals the dismissal of his defamation action against defendant A.R. Pearson for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm on the ground that the allegedly defamatory statements were opinions which were privileged under the First Amendment.

Diez, a member of the County Commission of Franklin County, Missouri, filed a one count petition for defamation against Pearson, the Franklin County Assessor, alleging that in October, 1990, Pearson wrote and sent letters to Franklin County newspapers. He alleged that three of these letters, one of which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Anton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Smith v. UAW-CIO Federal Credit UnionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matyska v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Ken Hammer v. The City of Osage Beach, Missouri, and Jim SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pape v. ReitherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Castle Rock Remodeling, LLC v. Better Business Bureau of Greater St. Louis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API