Legal Opinion
Trudell v. Pearll
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Bay; Houghton. (Samuel G.), J. Replevin by Noah Trudell against Iza Pearll for the possession of certain household goods. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Counsel state the questions involved are:
“(1) The refusal of the court to set aside the so-called verdict of the jury entered by the clerk in his absence, without his direction and without making any provision for a sealed or private verdict.
“(2) The error of the court in furnishing a jury after they had retired and in the absence of counsel for plaintiff and without their knowledge and consent a bill of particulars and the officers’ return and under circumstances that indicated gross irregularity in the passing of papers between the jury and counsel for the defendant at the time that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tubbs v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. OnestoMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Bethel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Highway Commissioner v. Gulf Oil Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Scott v. Angie’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Scott v. Angie’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.