Harris v. White

The suit was upon an attachment bond signed by several obligors.

The judgment entry recites that there was a jury duly sworn and impaneled, and that—

“Upon their oaths do say, after hearing the evidence in the case, we, the jury, find the issue in favor of the plaintiff, J. C. White, and assess his damage at §75.00. C. T. Kitchens, Foreman.”

The complaint was against W. S. Harris, E. N. McGriff, and A. O. Harris, each of whom, by attorney, for plea, and answer said: “They d^ny the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint.” Under such pleadings and issues, and the verdict of the jury thereon, the…