Legal Opinion
Finn v. Davis
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 20, 1985No. 84-8414-Civ-GONZALEZPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the defendants’ Renewed and Amended Motion to Compel Arbitration of All Claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be GRANTED.
FACTS
In 1983, the plaintiff opened an account with defendant, Prudential-Bache. In connection thereto, she signed an Option Agreement providing for arbitration of certain disputes.
In the event of any dispute between us or claim by me or claim by you on account of the purchase, sale, handling, execution or endorsement of puts or calls for any account, the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Shotto v. LaubDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- McMahon v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Intre Sport Ltd. v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.