Legal Opinion
Intre Sport Ltd. v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1985No. 85 Civ. 1968 (RWS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. (“Kidder, Peabody”) moves for an order of dismissal under Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., or in the alternative, arbitration of the claims of plaintiff Intre Sport, Ltd. (“Intre Sport”) which arise out of two sets of allegedly fraudulent transactions in securities. Kidder Peabody seeks the following relief: 1) dismissal of all claims alleged under section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933; 2) dismissal of the claim arising under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq (hereinafter “RICO”);…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- McMahon v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.