Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Neikirk
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from Yuma District Court. Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, Judge.
On January* 2, 1908, appellee Neikirk brought her action under, the code,, to quiet title to a quarter section *393of land in Yuma county, making the appellant company defendant. Plaintiff omitted to state in her complaint that she was in possession of the property, hut the defendant made no attempt prior to the trial, or at all, to take advantage of this omission. Indeed, it was admitted on the trial that plaintiff had sufficient possession of the property to entitle her to commence the aótion, and for that purpose the question of .possession would not be raised. It was also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bryant v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Carnahan v. Sieber Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Barnett v. JaynesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Charlton v. ToomeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. HowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kershner v. SganziniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Henrie v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- White Cap Mining Co. v. Resurrection Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Johnson v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Radetsky v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.