Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Steamship Aristidis

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 31, 1965No. 8503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.

No in rem process having been effected, the libelant, who qualified as the personal representative of the decedent’s estate on September 16, 1964, ob-tamed, a purported service upon the %n personam respondent by serving the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission of Virginia. The action was filed in this Court only two days after the libelant’s qualification as administrator. The respondent has filed a motion to quash the service of process. The question for determination is, of course, whether the in personam respondent was doing business or transacting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  5. Travelers Health Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd. v. MS GALINIDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  2. Pennington v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  3. Skarpelis v. Liberian M/T Arthur P.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API