United States v. Michael Gibson North
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
North sold a lot of LSD and gave a little cocaine to an undercover agent. At trial, he claimed entrapment. On appeal, he challenged: (1) a supplemental instruction allowing the jury to consider entrapment separately as to each transaction, (2) refusal of his supplier/co-defendant’s request for an entrapment instruction, (3) an instruction about undercover agents, (4) erroneous submission to the jury of extrinsic evidence, and (5) prosecutorial bad faith in adding cocaine charges and resisting discovery. We affirm.
I. FACTS.
North may or may not have sold large quantities…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Alexander E. MarabellesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Walter Douglas Emmert, United States of America v. Richard Gail ArriagaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Daniel J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. AlzankiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.