Legal Opinion

State v. Muetzel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The sheriff of Douglas County, Oregon, in the execution of the commands of a search-warrant, called to his assistance four deputies and searched the defendant’s premises for “mash, still, supplies, equipment and appliances -suitable and used for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky,” and, while so engaged, discovered a barrel of fermenting vinous liquor in the defendant’s bam. Concealed in the chicken-house they likewise discovered a jar alleged to contain moonshine whisky, and, in the dwelling-house, a number of glass containers which gave forth an odor evidencing that they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
  2. United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  3. United States v. CamarotaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1922
  4. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Merrell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. EberhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. RaperOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. FlorenceUtah Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API