Legal Opinion
In re the Adoption of the Monroe Township Housing Element
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 26, 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFSON, J.S.C.
I. Statement of the Case
The Township of Monroe filed this declaratory judgment action, pursuant to the authorization provided by the Supreme Court of *568New Jersey in In re Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by N.J. Council on Affordable Housing, 221 N.J. 1, 110 A.3d 31 (2015), (hereafter “Mount Laurel TV”) seeking a judicial declaration that its housing plan is presumptively valid and, if it is not, to determine what modifications are necessary to bring Monroe into compliance with its constitutional obligation to provide affordable housing.1
Before me is a motion filed by the New…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Notte v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Interchange State Bank v. RinaldiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Society Hill at Piscataway Condominium Ass'n v. Township of PiscatawayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- In re the Adoption of the Monroe Township Housing ElementNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015