Society Hill at Piscataway Condominium Ass'n v. Township of Piscataway
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFSON, J.S.C.
1. Statement of the Case
In this action, plaintiffs Society Hill at Piscataway Condominium Association, Inc. (“Society Hill”) and five individual owners of real property at Society Hill (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed this motion for summary judgment against defendant Township of Piscataway (“Piscataway”), claiming that its unilateral extension of existing thirty-year deed restrictions, which sought to regulate the resale and rental prices of low and moderate income units identified in and governed by a consent order in the Urban League litigation1 was unlawful. These…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TATIANA REITER (C-000071-17, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020