Cartwright v. Widemann
Hawaii Supreme Court
Replevin. Heard in vacation by consent as of the April Term, 1892, the jury having been waived.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion oe
Judd, C.J.
On the 16th of January last the plaintiffs were appointed receivers of the property of the Union Iron Works Company, a domestic corporation in an insolvent condition, and, in pursuance of authority from the court, brought this action of replevin. As the matter was urgent, both parties by written stipulation waived trial by jury and agreed that the case be heard by me in advance of the term when it would be regularly returnable. The case was presented on the 25th February. I find the following essential facts from the evidence adduced.
The Union Iron Works Company were duly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- McRea v. Central National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Short & Co. v. Trabue & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
- Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1949
- Harrison v. MarksHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
- Tax Appeal of Kaheawa Wind Power, LLC v. County of MauiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014