Short & Co. v. Trabue & Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 26 — PETITION EQUITV cited Edwards on Bills, 263; 4 Dev., (N. C„) 123; 7 Ala., 120; 2 Kelly, {Geo.,) 158; 2 Ala., 395; 5 lb., 286; 7 B. Mon., 578; Story Coriflictof Laws, 316,6; 1 Met., (Mass.,) 82; 12 Wendell, 439. cited 2 Kent, 459; 1 Adol & Ellis, New Series Eng. Rep., 43; 6 Mass., 159; 14 Vermont, 33; 7 B. Mon., 575.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDG-E BULLITT
delivered the ofihioh oe the court:
Clanton & McFadden executed a note in Kentucky, where they resided, to Short & Co., residents of Louisiana, payable at their office in New Orleans, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum. The note was indorsed and assigned by Short & Co., to Cayce & Hopkins, and by them to Trabue & Co. Both assignments were made in Kentucky, where Cayce & Hopkins and Trabue & Co. resided. The stipulated interest is lawful in Louisiana, and not here. The note not having been paid at maturity, Trabue & Co. had it protested, gave notice of its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Aymar v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Shanklin v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Grimshaw v. BenderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Dundas v. BowlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1844
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hunt v. Bay State Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Oliver Co. v. Louisville Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Pierce v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.