Legal Opinion

National Realty Appraisal Co. v. Art Club

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1937No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered on plaintiffs rule for judgment for want of a sufficient amended affidavit of defense and new matter.

On May 28, 1935, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract whereby defendant engaged the services of plaintiff to appraise its property and prepare an appeal on defendant’s behalf for the reduction in the city and school tax assessment for the year 1936. Its property is located at No. 220 South Broad Street, Philadelphia. The contract recited that defendant’s property was assessed for 1935 at $560,000; that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Fritz v. HathawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Taggart v. De FillippoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Hess v. Merion Title & Trust Co. of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fischer & Porter Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Wilson & Gardner Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Bertolet v. LanardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Bean v. Harleysville National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API