Legal Opinion

Bertolet v. Lanard

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1938No. Appeals, 320 and 331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The plaintiff, William H. Bertolet, Jr., formerly a director and stockholder of the Pilgrim Title & Trust Company, brought this action to recover certain moneys from Thomas Lanard, an attorney and also formerly a director and stockholder of the same trust company. The court below entered judgment against Lanard for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, upon the ground that a certain judgment obtained in the court below by Bernard N. Levene, a third director of the corporation, against Lanard in 1936, and affirmed by both appellate courts (126 Pa. Superior Ct.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Walker v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Philadelphia Auburn-Cord Co. v. ShockcorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Siegfried v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Williams v. Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Northampton Brewery Corp. v. LandeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Samuels v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Miller Et Ux. v. DierkenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Barker v. Barrett (Felker)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Bertolet v. LanardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API