State v. Ramirez

OPINION

YANZI, Judge.

{1} A jury found Defendant James Joseph Ramirez guilty of several crimes arising from a home invasion where a child victim was home alone. Defendant asserts on appeal that (1) multiple punishments violate his right to be free from double jeopardy, (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for child endangerment, and (3) the restraint used to convict him of kidnapping was incidental to the commission of another crime. We affirm in all respects.

BACKGROUND

{2} The facts are not in dispute. Victim was a child — fifteen at the time of the incident — who was…