Legal Opinion

Thomas Burnside v. Nueces County, Texas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2014No. 13-41344PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This interlocutory appeal arises from the denial of qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage. Plaintiff Burnside, a deputy sheriff, filed this § 1983 action alleging that, because he did not support defendant-Sheriff Kaelin’s re-election bid, he was punitively transferred, and later fired, for exercising his First-Amendment rights to engage in free speech and association. Sheriff Kaelin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss Burnside’s complaint based on qualified immunity. We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND.

I. Background

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Morgan v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  2. Bernice Garza v. Omar Escobar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Maria Ramirez v. Ruben Escajeda, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Parker v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  5. Smith v. City of MadisonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API