Legal Opinion

Maria Ramirez v. Ruben Escajeda, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2019No. 18-50125PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Government officials are often entitled to qualified immunity ("QI") from liability for civil damages for performing their discretionary duties. See, e.g. , Romero v. City of Grapevine , 888 F.3d 170 , 176 (5th Cir. 2018). And when a district court denies QI, we may immediately review the denial. Rich v. Palko , No. 18-40415, 920 F.3d 288 , 293-94, 2019 WL 1468176 (5th Cir. Apr. 3, 2019). But "we have jurisdiction only to decide whether the district court erred in concluding as a matter of law that officials are not entitled to [QI] on a given set of facts." Id.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Club Retro, L.L.C. v. HiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Martha Romero v. City of Grapevine, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hughes v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  2. Hicks v. LeBlancCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. Stevenson v. ToceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  4. Nevarez v. DorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
  5. Ramirez v. EscajedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API