Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
The court has before it Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld Under the “Deliberative Process” Privilege (Pl.’s Mot. or Motion), Defendant’s Opposition to Pacific Gas & Electric’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents Withheld Under the Deliberative Process Privilege and Response to the Court’s November 16, 2005 Order (Def.’s Resp. or Response), plaintiffs Reply in Support of Motion to Compel “Deliberative Process” Documents (Pl.’s Reply or Reply), and PG & E’s Response to Court’s Order of February 15, 2006 Regarding…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.