Legal Opinion

Rogelio Salas v. Fluor Daniel Services Corporation

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 29, 2020No. 14-18-01103-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Majority Opinion filed December 29, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01103-CV ROGELIO SALAS, Appellant V. FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-31173 MAJORITY OPINION Rogelio Salas appeals the trial court’s grant of no-evidence and traditional summary judgment in favor of Fluor Daniel Services Corporation (“Fluor”), contending in five issues that the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment on his workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API