United States v. Holmes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, an OPA investigator, was indicted and tried on charges of violating the extortion and bribery statutes. The jury found him not guilty of the former count, but guilty of the latter. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment having been denied, defendant has taken the instant appeal.
The undisputed facts may be outlined as follows: Defendant was assigned to investigate one Seltzer, a retail meat dealer. Detecting what he deemed to be a sale by Seltzer not in accordance with OPA regulations, defendant had a discussion with him. On the following day,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Glenn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.