Legal Opinion

Foetisch v. White

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

F. J. Foetisch and C. R. Craig brought this action to recover upon a promissory note for $4,800, and to foreclose a mortgage on a farm in Neosho county given to secure payment of the note. They named as defendants Mary E. White, R. E. Anderson, Paul Klein and the Phcenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, but there was no controversy among the parties as to the rights of the insurance company, and a judgment in its favor was rendered by consent.

Upon the evidence adduced judgment was given plaintiffs for the amount of the note and interest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Smith v. KibbeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Hendricks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Woodburn v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Hoffman v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Webb v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API