Legal Opinion
Anderson v. New York Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1944No. Civ. No. 14206PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company in a case tried before a jury. It is contended that the evidence submitted was insufficient to sustain the verdict and that error arose when the trial court gave to the jury an allegedly erroneous instruction on the subject of waiver by the insured.
Mrs. Beulah Anderson, as executrix of her husband’s estate, brought suit to collect disability benefits provided for in five separate policies of insurance which her husband had secured from the defendant company. Before the case was submitted to the jury she voluntarily…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Yohalem v. Columbian National Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
- Kantor v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Cochens v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949