Legal Opinion
Baucom v. Potter
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 17, 2002No. CIV. WMN-98-2625PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. Paper Nos. 68 (Defendant’s) and 71 (Plaintiffs). The motions are fully briefed. Upon a review of the motions and the relevant case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary and that Defendant’s motion should be denied, and Plaintiffs motion granted.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is an individual who has suffered for most of his adult life from alcoholism, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. He brings a claim pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Robert E. Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kitchen v. Summers Continuous Care Center, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
- Jay Hannah v. UPSCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Reyazuddin v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Manickavasagar v. Virginia Commonwealth University School of MedicineDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Center for Excellence v. Accreditation AllianceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026