BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE GABRIEL, Justice.
Appellant BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Appellee Stacy Wipff. In three issues, BNSF challenges the trial court’s denial of its demand for a jury shuffle, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s damage award for Wipffs future pain and mental anguish, and the trial court’s exclusion of evidence BNSF attempted to introduce during its cross-examination of Wipff. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the jury-shuffle issue.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts Leading to Wipff’s Lawsuit
The underlying facts are largely undisputed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Guajardo v. ConwellTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Rivas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.W., as Next Friend of A.W. v. Arlington Independent School District and Lindsey Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- Sarah Friend Neutze v. Texas Farmers Insurance Company and James 'Doug' Wasson, II, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
- Zurich American Insurance Company, as Successor by Merger to Maryland Casualty Company v. the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor to Burlington Northern Railroad Company, and as Successor in Interests to Great Northern Railway Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025