Legal Opinion
Carr v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 29, 2000No. 2-99-245-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Marion and Thomas Carr, appellants, sued Gregory H. Smith, D.O. and Scott Allen, M.D. for medical malpractice. The only issues appellants present for review after their two-week jury trial relate to the propriety of the jury shuffle granted by *131the trial court on Allen’s motion. We reverse.
Procedural Background
About a month before trial, one of the defendants, Scott Allen, M.D., filed a motion to use a confidential juror questionnaire form during voir dire. The proposed questionnaire contained 54 questions and included specific questions regarding juror…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Lorusso v. Members Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Patterson Dental Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jackson v. WILLIAMS BROS. CONST. CO., INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Merrill v. Sprint Waste Services LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re Houston County ex rel. SessionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Wells v. Barrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.