Shaw Family, LLC v. Advocates for Responsible Development

¶1 Shaw Family LLC appeals a Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW, decision by the Western Washington Growth Management *367Hearings Board (WWGMHB), arguing that the WWGMHB lacked subject matter jurisdiction, applied incorrect law, and violated Shaw Family’s constitutional rights. Shaw Family also argues that the administrative appeal by John E. Diehl and Advocates for Responsible Development (ARD) is moot. Diehl and ARD cross appeal, arguing, among other things, that the Lewis County Superior Court judge abused his discretion in imposing CR 11 sanctions against Diehl.1

¶2 We hold that…