Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Odel Graham and Patricia Ann Taylor, United States of America v. Lonnie Patrick

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1976No. 75-1800 and 75-2629PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before: WRIGHT, CHOY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Appellants Graham, Taylor and Patrick were convicted after trial to the court of conducting an illegal gambling business [18 U.S.C. § 1955], consisting of dice and “blackjack” games. Their main contentions on appeal are that their acts were not within the reach of the federal statute in that the dice game was not a “banking or percentage game” proscribed by California Penal Code § 330 and that the business did not meet the “substantially continuous operation” or “gross revenue” requirement of Section 1955(b)(l)(iii). We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. SaccoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Martin Nelson Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. People v. AmbroseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. AmbroseAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Robert William Gilley, United States of America v. Benjamin Louis RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. ZemekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API