Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Chicago R. R. v. McFarland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Gass Common Pleas.,

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Complaint by McFarland against the Cincinnati and Chicago Railroad Company, for an assessment of damages. A jury was empanneled by the sheriff, and an assessment of damages was made and returned to the proper Court. Upon such return, the code provides, 2 Gr. & H. p. 814, sec. 697, that, “Any defendant may appear and traverse any material fact therein stated in the inquest, or he may plead or show any valid matter in bar of the right of the plaintiff to hav-e the benefit of such writ, and issues of law and of fact may he made up aud tried, and the Court may adjudge costs therein, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swinney v. Ft. Wayne, Muncie & Cincinnati R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Miles v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Robinson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API