Legal Opinion

Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Adams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1887No. 12,954PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Amanda Adams sued the appellant railway company to recover damages for the alleged failure of the latter to comply with a written agreement, wherein the-*303company agreed to build a substantial fence on both sides of its track, and construct a crossing over its right of way, in consideration of a grant of a right' of way by the plaintiff over her farm.

The defendant answered by a general denial and a plea of payment. There was a finding and judgment, over a motion for a new trial, for the plaintiff below.

The only error relied on is the ruling of the court in overruling the appellant’s motion for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Burdell v. DenigSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Gould v. Banks & GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  4. Starry v. WinningIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Carmichael v. ShielIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Avery v. Nordyke & Marmon Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Blair v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API