Legal Opinion

People v. Garza

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2005No. S120551PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

This case involves the interplay between two criminal law statutes: one a provision of the Penal Code, the other a provision of the Vehicle Code.

Subdivision (a) of Penal Code section 496 (hereafter section 496(a)) defines the crime of receiving stolen property. It also provides that a person who has been convicted of the theft of property may not also be convicted of receiving the same property. This provision codifies a common law rule prohibiting separate convictions of the same person for stealing and receiving the same property. (People v. Allen (1999) 21 Cal.4th 846,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API