Legal Opinion
United States v. Jouan
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided May 31, 1977No. 31,747; CM 433458PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
Prior to trial where the appellant was found guilty of assault with a means likely to produce grievous bodily harm,1 defense counsel submitted a written request for three witnesses on the merits, including specialist Four Talbott and Private First Class Larry Crooks, both of whom had testified at the Article 322 hearing. Following the investigation, it had been noted in the officer’s report that there would be absent only a single prospective witness, one Sergeant Bell, who was expected to testify for the prosecution. However, when defense counsel submitted a written request for witnesses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. ManosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. AriasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MercierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.