Legal Opinion

Sommer v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 22, 1974No. 74 Civ. 741 (MIG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, District Judge:

This is a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, by the plaintiff Sigmund Sommer in his action to obtain the return of a deposit of $100,000 made in connection with an offer to purchase the Statler Hilton Hotel (“the Hotel”) in New York City from the defendant, Hilton Hotels Corporation (“Hilton”) for $20,000,000. The action was removed to the federal court on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1441. New York law governs. Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99, 65 S.Ct. 1464, 89 L.Ed. 2079 (1945). The history of the transaction is as follows, as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Candid Productions, Inc. v. International Skating UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. ButlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Reprosystem, BV v. SCM Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Stonehill v. Security National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API