Capehart v. Hale
West Virginia Supreme Court
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
PIOFEMAN, Judge.
■In a bill in equity preferred by an executor, as such, he ought-to describe himself as the executor of his testator. He should do this, in order that the defendant may ‘ be informed as to the particular character in which he professes to act, and may conveniently ascertain and approve or controvert the reality of the character, and the consequences resulting from it; and that the court and clerk may conveniently shape and enter the decree in conformity to the statement. It is not proper for an executor who sues, to describe himself merely as “personal representative” of a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roget v. MerritNew York Supreme Court · 1804
- Champlin v. ParishNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Smith v. ArnoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1829
3Cited by18 opinions
- Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Steenrod's Adm'r v. W. P. & B. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. PetersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Henderson v. HenrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Garten v. LaytonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.